Відео

Fascinating. I've completely enjoyed it. Thank you. ❤

This matters for far more serious reasons. It shows that great lies and deceptions can and have been carried out by the very top of society and been perpetuated for many hundreds of years. WE WERE LIED TO and we still are being lied to. This was a systematically organised conspiracy to deceive. This involved not only top members of the English aristocracy but Elizabeth and James 1st. The consequences and motivations may have been reasonably benign but what this reveals should make us wonder how many other matters that have formed the foundations of our historical record are also fraudulent? We already know of some of them, but how many more exist that we have have not yet discovered? The truth is that we live in a world of lies and deceptions some of which are far older then this one. In my opinion virtually everything that we believe is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth is not. This applies to virtually all subject matters, to a great or greater degree. Knowledge is power. This is why our Owners retain so much of the latter and we remain with so little of the former. It is perhaps ironic that the greatest proponent of the Enlightenment namely Sir Francis Bacon was one of the Worlds greatest liars and deceivers as well as one of the smartest and most influential persons ever to have lived. Bacon and his co-conspirators may have had the best intentions in mind when embarking on this great project to deceive the masses, but the motivation is relatively unimportant with regards to its clear implications. This also amply demonstrates that it is far easier to fool someone than convince them that they have been fooled.

My body didn't like meds.. after surgery I wanted to be more awake..not still not with out my

God Bless my brain.. my dreams are full of information

Terrace Howard is saying it's not energy it frequents

Can not tell me that the creator of our process center does not have access to be influential. Or to communicate with us. Biblical prophecies have been fullfiled through dreams.

STOP... Dreams DO NOT COME FROM THE HUMAN BRAIN. Body Mind Idiocy and limitations cannot lead. STOP IT ALREADY. Aristotle got it wrong.

I love Dennett, but Sapolskly destroyed him here. I'm not sure how he failed to realize how his own theory is encompassed by Sapolskys. It was explained with such detail.

I will further elaborate, formalize and demonstrate applications of the both/and logic across various specific domains: Mathematics The multivalent structure of the both/and logic allows formalizing more nuanced relationships between fundamental mathematical concepts that have traditionally been treated as strictly dichotomous: • Continuity and Discreteness Let C(x) and D(x) represent the truth values that a mathematical object x exhibits continuous and discrete properties respectively. Classical bivalent logic forces C(x) and D(x) to be mutually exclusive (C(x) = 1 → D(x) = 0 and vice versa). But the both/and logic allows formulations like: C(x) = 0.7, D(x) = 0.5, with a coherence ○(C(x), D(x)) = 0.6 Capturing how x can simultaneously exhibit continuous and discrete characteristics to varying degrees, which are partially compatible rather than strictly exclusive. • Finite and Infinite Similarly for propositions F(x) and I(x) about an object x being finite or infinite, we can have multivalued assignments: F(x) = 0.3, I(x) = 0.8, ○(F(x), I(x)) = 0.4 Representing x as primarily infinite in nature but with residual finitary aspects that are somewhat coherent. The synthesis operator ⊕ further allows formalizing novel mathematical objects transcending these poles: finite kernel ⊕ perpetually generative procedure = transfinite set • Logicism and Mathematical Realism The both/and logic also accommodates different ontological perspectives. We could have for a mathematical object x: Truth(x is objective Platonic reality) = 0.6 Truth(x is subjective human construction) = 0.4 ○(objective, subjective) = 0.7 With a moderate synthesis representing the coconstituted, intersubjective emergence of mathematical reality: objective logical constraints ⊕ subjective creative exploration = novel mathematical structure So rather than legislating a strictly objectivist or anti-realist view, the logic nuances the irreducible complementarities between ideal and constructed aspects in the generative disclosure of mathematics. Its expressive flexibility aligns with actual mathematical understanding. Physics In quantum physics, the both/and logic allows explicitly representing and operating with the intrinsic indeterminacies, pluralities and paradoxes that have resisted classical representation: • Superposition and Wavefunction Collapse Propositions like "electron has spin up" and "electron has spin down" are not forced into bivalent exclusivity, but can be simultaneously true to degrees: Spin_up(e) = 0.6, Spin_down(e) = 0.5, ○(Spin_up(e), Spin_down(e)) = 0.7 With a coherence value capturing their contextual compatibility or complementarity in the superposed state prior to measurement/collapse. This avoids the dilemma of having to artificially insist the electron strictly has or lacks a particular spin until collapse. Its indefinite potentials are modeled positively using graded truth values. • Nonlocality and Holistic Correlations Propositions about separated entangled particles like "has spin up" can be holistically correlated: Spin_up(A) = 0.8, Spin_up(B) = 0.8, ○(Spin_up(A), Spin_up(B)) = 1 With maximal coherence of their truth values capturing the paradoxical holistic unity of the entangled system, which cannot be modeled as a conjunction of independent local states in classical logic. The synthesis operation captures this gestaltist whole: Spin_up(A) ⊕ Spin_up(B) = Entangled_state(A,B) So the both/and logic provides symbolic resources for explicitly representing and reasoning about quantum phenomena, without artificially forcing them into inapplicable classical categories. Cognitive Science The logic's multivaluedness has fruitful cognitive modeling applications: • Intuitive and Analytical Reasoning Let I(x) and A(x) represent intuitive and analytical assessments about a decision scenario x. The both/and logic can capture their integration: I(x) = 0.7, A(x) = 0.5, ○(I(x), A(x)) = 0.6 Modeling x as involving a moderate synthesis of intuitive and analytical factors with reasonable mutual coherence, rather than insisting they are strictly exclusive. The synthesis operation further formalizes integrated judgments: intuition(x) ⊕ analysis(x) = decision(x) Capturing how cognition fluidly operates across and conjoins both modes of reasoning, not merely one or the other in isolated silos. • Cognitive Biases and Non-Normative Reasoning Classical logic frames human reasoning errors like the conjunctive fallacy (A&B > Max(A,B)) as strictly invalid and incoherent deviations from normative rationality. But the both/and logic allows assigning graded truth values: Truth(A) = 0.7 Truth(B) = 0.9 Truth(A&B) = 0.85 Capturing the coherence of these "fallacious" intuitive logic patterns measuring ○(A, B, A&B). The synthesis operator further models how our heuristic judgments integrate intuitive and analytical factors: representativeness(A&B) ⊕ statistical_logic(A,B) ⇒ judged_probability(A&B) Rather than framing biases as mere "errors", the both/and logic allows positive modeling of how non-normative patterns coexist and synthesize with other cognitive mechanisms into globally coherent judgments. Philosophy of Mind The logic's paraconsistent structure provides an ideal framework for the mind-body problem: • Subjectivity and Objectivity Define S(x) as degree of subjectivity and O(x) as degree of objectivity for a mind-body state x. Classical substance dualism enforces mutual exclusivity: S(x) = 1 → O(x) = 0, and vice versa. But the both/and logic allows modeling x as an integrated experienced whole with: S(x) = 0.6, O(x) = 0.5, ○(S(x), O(x)) = 0.7 Capturing how objective and subjective factors are complementary interdependent aspects of the same reality, rather than strictly separable substances. The coherence value reflects their coconstituted integration, while the synthesis operator ⊕ expresses their gestalt unity: subjective experience ⊕ objective description = psychophysical state This avoids the forced either/or choices of classical mind-body theory between dualism, reductionism or eliminativism. It allows modeling consciousness as an irreducibly co-realized pluriverse. In summary, the both/and logic provides rational symbolic tools for positively representing, operating with, and synthesizing resolutions for the paradoxes and indeterminacies permeating actual scientific and philosophical domains, without reductively forcing them into bivalent categories or binary assimilation. Its expressive flexibilities and constructive procedures illuminate new pathways for coherently modeling and advancing past the limitations of classical logical frameworks. Across mathematics, physics, cognitive science and philosophy of mind, the multivalued, paraconsistent and holistically integrative architecture of the both/and logic catalyzes expanded conceptual possibilities better aligned with the phenomenological complexities and ontological pluralities disclosed by cutting-edge inquiry. It opens up new horizons for descriptively encompassing, not dissimulating, the exquisite nuances and generative potentials of the world. So in essence, the both/and logic is not just another symbolic formalism, but a pivotal symbolic emancipation - unleashing rational discourse to fruitfully navigate the ambiguities, paradoxes and ontological pluralities intrinsic to manifest existence and human understanding. A new praxis of open coherence, where rationality and reality productively co-disclose each other in a perpetual dance of perpetual re-attunement and dialectic reconstitution.

But I guess I could go against the theory of use it or lose it, but not in errotix dreams or lucid !?... This is so entriging our brains and your research

If that makes any sense, and hoping it came out the way I meant for it to. ( Can't write ) that is a part of my Brian that never worked 😎.

This is very interesting about the Parkinson's being fluid in the acting out part of their dreams. I wonder if you ever had any other disabilities tested (MS MD...) if the spine is part of the Brain, than but not severed just extreme damage is this still possible? People who sleep walk, can this be a sign of PD? I mean all though most of them are not combative, but can have a sandwich and conversation while walking around and some venture out on to the streets . Something like we all use to be familiar with when our grandparents got "SENILE" now we call it dementias!? I believe this had to be replaced bcz of that stigma " ya going senile, loosing your mind " your getting senile. Statement, and not having the empathy behind it as we do presently. Does lucid dreams and so do we use up all our executive frontal actions when young is the causation to PD, as much as it is in all dementia patients ??? So we have a limited charging capacities? If we overuse certain functions as in a veteran when having nightmares, and antipsychotic drugs? Or as in a repetitive dreams when someone always thinking they being chased the adrenaline used up in dreams seems to me that you have come up with the strongest link to our current and future pandemic in our metabolic and and some specific neurological diseases.... I pray you futher expand your sleep labs into a broader and younger studies and are able to follow them and someday hopefully this will be an endemic for all who are affected by this. I'm sure environmental issues...

The problem that Zizek is running into is that Israel has done a lot of propaganda to equate Hamas with regular Palestinians. They are *not* the same.

Write your dreams down first thing before you do anything

The first audience question sounds like Sam Harris.

❤ thank you for helping me understand importance of why we dream , so i can stop Saying i hate dreaming lol ❤ Night terrors are trauma. Dr Bradley Nelson body code or emotion code can addreess this One must release emotions trapped either in this life or another ❤

God Bless him.

he talks so much because it's a talk show 😂

If determinism is true we don't say or feel or do anything we are just witnessing a movie unfolding before us

Sadhguru explains this perfectly it's a matter of compulsive behavior versus conscious behavior

Sapolsky was being sarcastic saying control is made of magic but isn't it ?

The failure of the deterministic argument is its lack of understanding of the nature of cause and effect everything is transaction

Determinism Kool-Aid is popular lately

We would all be nothing more than a bunch of Pinocchio's if determinism was true

Bad sound. I'm off

I have almost complete dream recall. If you asked me what dream I had last Tuesday I would usually be able to call it back to me in great detail. I am not certain what this says about my brain being able to retain the dream information long after the dreamtime is gone. My dreams are so much like reality that I often wonder upon awakening how I could have been so convinced that that dreamlife was my life; fascinating!!

I had a recurring nightmare as a kid where the grim reaper would approach me always with the words "I am the devil of darkness" & it scared the life out of me every time. At some point I had it so often that when he appeared I just said, annoyed, "not you again" & woke up instantly. The next day my school bully pushed me against the wall & I just instinctively turned the table and grabbed his collar pushing him against the wall. The color drained out of his face & he never put hands on me again. Changed my life.

34:09,, in the Bible,, Jesus said that the kingdom of god and heaven is within,, and Neville Goddard says that god is imagination. We create our future with our thoughts, imagination ,beliefs and working towards those beliefs. Except for nature, we co-create our reality. Religions and governments know this, that’s where they get their power. From us, it’s all being scripted, think beautiful thoughts, peace

Brilliant neurosurgeon but explaining dreams and translated to 25 languages, with all due respect, he has no clue. And yet to understand dreams and every other human condition is so easy to understand. Im hard at work trying to finish my book, Dimensions of Reality.

31:09,,, There is no time in dreaming or you can time travel. Most people do it but don’t usually remember doing it,, it’s that vail between the awaken state and the dream state. That vail can be lowered by practice, like dream journaling. Practicing awareness. Sometimes looking at it in a different perspective, like the lack of sleep or being drunk, it’s called hallucinations. That would be like dreaming while you’re awake. Remembering is the hard part. Using your imagination is also like dreaming but with a little more control. An architect or builder imagines a home from beginning to end and in between and then comes back to present to draw it down to what we call blueprints. The carpenter can take these blueprints and mentally pre- construct this , many times before it is completed. In dreams, hallucinations and imaginations ,one can time travel, the hard part is remembering. Everything we create is from that world, look around, even the phone you hold in your hand, once was a dream. Do you remember Buck Rogers

Sleep paralysis is TERRIFYING

7:44. Doing math in a dream. There was a time when I was trying to figure out the mathematics in doing a spiral staircase . I did a lot of studying but still was having trouble understanding. Then one morning on awakening, I had the answer. Maybe I was trying to hard in my waken state. But while resting in sleep, I dreamed of laying out and building that spiral staircase, what a refreshing morning to wake to. You can do math in dreams

I really appreciate the talk on erotic dreams. I’ve had some wild ones

I think determinism holds. However, defining freedom as an ability to act without constraints of laws of nature isn't what freedom is about. As Dennett would say: "What do you want, float independently of gravity?" We're part of nature and therefore our actions are defined by its laws. No doubt. I think there is much better and relevant definition of freedom (given by Dennett). Freedom is an ability to anticipate consequence of once's actions and to act accordingly (with the assumption that one can act in accordance with his will, without duress). Why is is this definition better? Because it's compatible with both determinism and moral responsibility. People who don't have this ability aren't taken to be morally responsible for their actions (I think rightly so). Think about a person with an episode of schizophrenia. Person isn't in touch in reality and hence can't anticipate consequences of his/her actions. If he does something against the law, do we send this person to jail? Not really, he goes to a hospital, not jail. Therefore, he isn't held as morally responsible (neither is your dog). Freedom is a unique feature of the human brain (prefrontal cortex). Prefrontal cortex is where reasoning, predicting the feature and self-control come from. Seeing freedom this way, we see it's more a matter of degree rather than absolute terms (either complete freedom or no freedom at all). Freedom is a complex phenomenon which depends on our ability to reason, knowledge about the world, ability to act against the conditioning of the mind (meditation is a practice which makes us stronger here, Buddhist monks are one of fantastic examples), state of consciousness etc. This defintion, I think, makes much more sense. It adds a whole new level of complexity in what it means to be free.

ua-cam.com/video/PFJPtVRlI64/v-deo.htmlsi=ONFdSdaevumBiaP4 What if you cut the corpus callosum ⁉️⁉️⁉️

As a person (54) with slightly attentional problems, my take on reality has become that the word Lucid is very real not only when dreaming. I have to learn Lucid LIVING and works on it. Then the question is, isnt there ALLWAYS dreaming going on ? Only that the attention directs the consciousness to the senses when awake ? And to dreaming when the senses are turned off ?

I am where my attention goes

Or...maybe they come from source and the brain just has the memory of the dream.

Caracalla ~ 'I'm dying for a piss'

Robert is so intelligent yet not much wisdom. Love it.

Wow, Daniel has changed my thoughts

How is it possible that I would create my sleeping dreams from childhood and years way before it is proven now in awake? Would that be predicted future episodes? I have questions.

I had a dream - I woke screaming - and it was a warning that I was in danger from my then husband & his paramour. Yes, I too believe the brain is like blue tooth.

Richard Dawkins says DNA is computer code. Bill Gates says DNA is more complex than any software ever devised. When laughing at people who cling to indefensible creation myths whilst refusing to be guided by legitimate evidence - start with yourselves.

This guy talks so much...does he actually say something new or useful?

Daniel lost his point as soon as he spoke

A leftist love-in. Did they get a room afterwards?

Its helpful to hear both sides of the issue. Very informative. Love it

It's amazing how complex our bodies and lives are. Did it all start with nothing, then stardust, then a single cell organism, and so on and so forth.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂